Most Popular

Most Viewed
Most Commented
News
"Most Popular" tools sponsored by:
Recent Articles
Related Articles

Recent Articles By Ellis E. Conklin

National Features

  • Cleveland Scene
    Dangerous Liaisons

    Another by-product of the privatization of the Iraq War: sexual assault.

    By Lisa Rab
  • Seattle Weekly
    The DUI King

    Meet Bob Castle, a drunk who always seems to find a way to drive.

    By Rick Anderson
  • City Pages
    "How Can This Stuff Be Legal?"

    Take a toke of Salvia Divinorum and you'll wonder, too.

    By Matt Snyders

"James Earl Ray was almost certainly a programmed obedient patsy," asserts Barsten. "He was brainwashed. If you look into hypnotism, you'll find that 5 to 10 percent of people are very susceptible to it. And James was one of those."

In laying out their argument, Barsten and John Ray claim there's no credible way James Earl Ray could have killed King — that the angle from which the fatal shot was fired proves that the shot could not have come from Ray's flophouse room, and that the slug embedded in King did not match the remaining bullets in Ray's Remington rifle. Like many other King conspiracy theorists, Barsten and Ray also argue that the plot and execution of the crime were far too complicated for an assassin to have acted alone.

But Truth At Last's main thrust originates with the revelation of a single seminal event: A purported shooting in 1948 of a black soldier named Washington, which, Ray and Barsten argue at great length, led James Earl Ray down a ruinous path that decades later would lead him to enter his fateful guilty plea:

While on duty as an MP in Occupied Germany, Jimmy spent much of his time arresting AWOL soldiers. In so doing, James was involved in several shootings, but there was one particular shooting of a soldier that had a major impact on James, haunting him for the rest of his life.

In this incident, James wounded an African-American soldier named Washington, from Tennessee.... James felt horrible about shooting this soldier — horrible in a life-altering way. For the rest of his life, James appeared to be plagued with guilt, and always grasping for a deeper understanding of the shooting. Later, when speaking about the King case, he'd say, 'It all goes back to the shooting of [that] soldier, Washington.'

The shooting, according to John Ray, severed Washington's spinal cord and made him a cripple the rest of his life. "James tried to find him when he got out the service, but never could," says Ray.

Adds Barsten: "James never wanted to shoot this man. But I believe this was a test to see whether he'd do something against his will. I personally believe this was an early mind-control operation."

Barsten, however, concedes he was unable to find any military records that indicated Ray was involved in a shooting or that he served with a soldier named Washington. "It is all based on John's word," Barsten says.

Back home in Quincy, John Ray zips his black leather jacket against the chill and tries again to understand why his brother pled guilty to killing King.

"I never knew why he did it. It shocked me, because there was no evidence that James had done this," says Ray. "I think it all had to do with that soldier, Washington."

But how? It doesn't make sense.

"I know," he says.

In the book Ray recounts the 1974 visit he made to his brother's cell at the Shelby County Jail in Tennessee. Asked to elaborate, Ray says his brother told him, "'I had no choice. Because they were going to bring all this stuff out about the shooting of Washington and they were going to make a race case out of it.'"

Adds Barsten: "I know that this plea bargain does seem hard to make any sense of."

In the late fall of 1967, John Larry Ray purchased a building on Arsenal Street in south St. Louis and opened a tavern. To pay for the building, Ray says, he plunked down the better part of $25,000 James had given him — money the elder Ray said he'd received from the Mob. John Ray first thought of calling his new bar Jack's Place, but he ultimately decided on the Grapevine Tavern, a homage to the "prison grapevine."

The tavern, situated across from Benton Park at 1982 Arsenal, opened New Year's Day 1968. Almost immediately, it became a magnet for government informants and two-bit criminals, and a popular watering hole for supporters of segregationist and American Independent Party candidate George Wallace, whose campaign headquarters was on the same block. ("We had his buttons and posters and everything. I voted for Wallace," says Ray. "Now, James — he always liked Nixon.")

According to Barsten's research, and from what John Ray has told Barsten of those days, the Wallace pamphlets were furnished to the Grapevine by St. Louis police officers who, in exchange for this political kindness, promised to look the other way if Ray kept the bar open an extra couple of hours past closing time.

In the book, John Ray recounts — and dismisses — the story of John Kaufmann, a former St. Louis stockbroker, and a local patent attorney named John Sutherland, both of whom were active in the Wallace campaign. The men were said to have offered Russell Byers, a notorious local art thief, a $50,000 bounty in late 1967 or early 1968 to kill Martin Luther King. (For more on Russell Byers, see Chad Garrison's story "The Rockwell Files," published in the June 6, 2007, edition of Riverfront Times and available at www.riverfronttimes.com.)

"That was all made-up," grouses John Ray. "That committee made it up to justify their $6 million budget."

Nonetheless, the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded in 1979 that while James Earl Ray indisputably fired the shot that killed King, it was quite possible Kauffman and Sutherland may have been "racially inspired" to put a bounty on the civil-rights leader's head.

Ray sold the Grapevine in 1969. A machine shop now occupies the premises, turning out safety glasses for industrial use.

On the afternoon of April 2, 1968, the phone rang at the Grapevine. It was James Earl Ray, calling for his brother from the New Rebel Motel on the outskirts of Memphis. James said he was there to meet the next day with a government agent named "Raul," a slim, red-haired man he'd met in Canada years before, back when he ran drugs and guns. Raul, James told John, had instructed him to bring the Remington rifle with him.

"Jimmy told me he wanted me to come see him in Memphis," John Ray recalls.

Write Your Comment show comments (3)
  1. This is yet more conspiracy nonsense from John Ray and Lyndon Barston.It is an uncorroborated, speculative and extremely biased account from the assassin's brother who has been in league with conspiracy buffs for years. John Ray has lied his way through a lifetime of deception and criminality therefore it comes as no surprise he has written a conspiracy book; the type of book publishers love to peddle because they have a captive audience consisting of vast legions of paranoid US citizens.The notion that John, Jerry and James Ray were not racist is pure fantasy as Gerald Posner proves in his remarkable book 'Killing The Dream'. Even James Earl Ray's extended family have testified that James' racism was pathological and violent.James and Jerry Ray were friends and admirers of Georgia's notorious race baiter JB Stoner - how much more racist can you get than that?
    See:http://www.crimemagazine.com/05/martinlutherking,0612-5.htm
    Mel Ayton

  2. I would suggest that readers look at the HSCA report on the St. Louis connection to a conspiracy and then determine if it is all made up nonsense as Jerry Ray contends. "Raoul" and his payments are a cover for the $10k or so Ray needed to stay on the lamb for 14 months , which coincidentally followed the July '67 robbery of a bank in Alton which was likely pulled off by James and John Ray. It is much more plausible that John Sutherland's money and John Kauffman's connections to crime would be behind money given to Ray than some shadowy "Raoul" figure whom noone has ever seen.

    http://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report/part-2b.html

  3. It is said that everyone is bi to some extent. Not sure about this. But I also heard about the same from the site BiLoves, which is exclusively for bisexuals and bicurious looking to explore their sexuality. Maybe it depends on how to define it.

Riverfront Times Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff